![]() ![]() Trick #2: Supreme Court will NOT fuck with ANY decision which rest upon "INDEPENDENT and ADEQUATE state court grounds" Guys look. You guys know the Supreme Court loves to hear cases about Ambassadors and it's in the Constitution, so this shit would never fly. My mind was blown when I realized you could just memorize the routes and win this game every timeĬan you imagine the look on Amy Coney Barretts face if Congress said "yea you can no longer hear cases about AMBASSADORS.". ![]() S - States (disputes between two states lol) They also can't take away cases that the Constitution DIRECTLY allows the Supreme Court to hear aka PACS-MAN actually nobody can use the Supreme Court anymore." And just eliminate them from the judiciary entirely. The MBE likely won't test this but Congress couldn't just say like "haha yea. BuzzPhrase(TM) you are looking for: CONGRESS CAN USE THEIR ARTICLE III POWER TO LIMIT THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT. Congress will come for blood and limit his appellate review power. You guys ever heard of Separation of Powers? Justice Roberts CANNOT just start wilding out on the bench. It's all wrong!" and you'll freak out and choose some type of strange answer choice about the Supremacy clause and then start sweating in your chair. Surely Congress can't mess with their almighty authority. Then you will stop and think to yourself on the exam ".wtf. That's not allowed."Ĭongress will get pissed and PASS a statute which says "THE SUPREME COURT NO LONGER HAS APPELLATE COURT JURISDICTION TO MAKE FUTURE RULINGS ON GERRYMANDERING!" This will be the scenario: Some states will start fucking with the district maps so they can get their weird friends elected to office: aka GERRYMANDERING. You know this will be on the test in July. Trick #1: Article III gives Congress authority to fuck with the type of cases the Supreme Court can hear (aka they can limit Young SCOTUS' appellate review power) Alright guys, stop playing. The tricks, the nuances, and all the ways the MBE breaks our heart - again, and again, and again. If you study hard on this subject: you will pick up a SHITLOAD of points and truly be back on top. THIS is how they test Con Law on the MBE once you understand what to look for: There is not a lot of room for them to FINESSE US like they can in the other subjects. If you don't know what a legislative veto is, that is on you. within property?"Ĭon Law doesn't do all that. Has anyone ever looked at a Property answer explanation and it says the words "residuary legatee" or "donative transfer" or "ademption" and you stop and think to yourself "are these crazy fucks giving me a Wills question. I have no idea what kind of landscape this is, how common these boulders are. Has anyone ever looked at a Contracts question and just thought to themselves: I have no fucking idea which party allocated the risk of there being a bigass boulder underneath the ground halfway through this drilling project. But Con Law is MISUNDERSTOODĬon Law after you all talked shit about himĬonstitutional Law is what I call a "beatable subject" Almost everyone I talked to in February actually told me they hated it with a passion. I have gathered all three of you here today in my weird and lonely subreddit to talk about a very special subject near and dear to my tired, weary heart which has developed a mild arrhythmia: Constitutional Law.Įveryone absolutely hates this subject - people talk shit about it constantly. Good afternoon my friends and former lovers ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |